SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Brinks Security Services Limited v Nickson Mwanga Elioji [2021] KEHC 13302 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 13302 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
13302
Citation
[2021] KEHC 13302 (KLR)
Decided
12 August 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplicant seeks stay of execution of judgment and decree pending appealCoramC.M.Eoli
Holding

Motion granted on condition that Applicant deposits entire decretal sum into a joint interest earning account within 30 days

Facts

Applicant Brinks Security Services Limited seeks stay of execution of judgment and decree in Milimani CMCC No. 6390 of 2017 due to dissatisfaction with the decision and likelihood of appeal being rendered nugatory due to execution of assets.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant stay of execution pending appeal
  2. Whether Applicant has met conditions for stay

Reasoning

Court considers the substantial amounts in the decree and the lack of proof of Respondent's financial means, granting stay pending appeal with condition for security deposit.

Outcome

Motion granted

Orders

  • Stay of execution granted pending appeal
  • Security deposit of entire decretal sum into a joint interest earning account within 30 days

Remedies

  • Security deposit of decretal sum

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (7)
  • Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal (1982) KLR 417
  • Siegfried Busch v MCSK (2013) eKLR
  • James Wangalwa & Another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto (2012) eKLR
  • Edward Kamau & Another v Hannah Mukui Gichuki Misc. No. 78 of 2015
  • Shell v Shell (1988) 2 KAR
  • Nduhiu Gitahi and Another -Vs- Anna Wambui Warugongo (1988) 2 KAR
  • Rosengrens -Vs- Safe Deposit Centres Limited (1984) 3 ALLER 198
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case