SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Football Kenya Federation, Nick Mwendwa & Barry Otieno v Cabinet Secretary Ministry Of Sports, Culture and Heritage, Sports Registrar, FKF Inspection Committee, Attorney General, FKF Caretaker Committee & Secretary to the FKF Caretaker Committee; Kariobangi Sharks Football Club, Posta Rangers Football Club, Bidco United Football Club, Mombasa County Football Association, Kakamega County Football Association, Mandera County Football Association, Uasin Gishu County Football Association & Migori County Football Association (Interested parties) (Petition E473 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 13578 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (7 December 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEHC 13578 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
13578
Citation
[2021] KEHC 13578 (KLR)
Decided
7 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional and Human RightsPosturePetition for declaration and ordersCoramH. I. ONG’UDI
Holding

The court declares that the inspection process was irregular, unlawful, and a nullity.

Facts

The petitioners claim that the inspection of Football Kenya Federation (FKF) by the Ministry of Sports, Culture and Heritage was irregular, unlawful, and a nullity. They seek a declaration that the inspection was not conducted properly.

Issues

  1. Irregularity and unlawfulness of the inspection process
  2. Validity of the inspection under Section 52 of the Sports Act

Reasoning

The court found that the inspection was not conducted in accordance with the law and was therefore irregular and unlawful.

Outcome

The court declares the inspection process irregular, unlawful, and a nullity.

Orders

  • A declaration that the inspection process was irregular, unlawful, and a nullity

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Sports Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case