SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lalji Meghi Patel & Company Limited v Kabete Dam Limited (Miscellaneous Application E1128 of 2020) [2021] KEHC 223 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (11 November 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEHC 223 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
223
Citation
[2021] KEHC 223 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for recognition and enforcement of arbitral awardCoramWA OKWANY
Holding

The application is allowed, and the arbitral award is recognized and enforced as an order of the court. The costs of the application shall be borne by the respondent.

Facts

The applicant and respondent submitted their dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator made an award in favor of the applicant on May 18, 2020. The applicant sought clarification and correction of the award on June 19, 2020, and the arbitrator affirmed the final, corrected, and additional award on August 3, 2020. The respondent did not set aside the award.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the orders sought
  2. Whether the applicant has complied with the requirements of the Arbitration Act

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant has complied with the requirements of the Arbitration Act and that the application remains unopposed. The court recognized and enforced the arbitral award.

Outcome

The arbitral award is recognized and enforced as an order of the court.

Orders

  • The arbitral award is recognized and enforced as an order of the court

Remedies

  • The costs of the application shall be borne by the respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Arbitration Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Samura Engineering Limited vs Don-Wood Co Ltd [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case