SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Owino Okeyo and Co Advocates v Kenya National Assurance (2001) Limited & another [2021] KEHC 2447 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 2447 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2447
Citation
[2021] KEHC 2447 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from the dismissal of the original suit, with the plaintiff's claim dismissed and the defendants' amended counterclaim upheld.CoramJ. K. SERGON
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff was in breach of the lease agreement and is entitled to the sum of Kshs.2,002,167.14 as rent arrears and service charge.

Facts

The plaintiff, Owino Okeyo & Co. Advocates, was a tenant of the suit property, and the defendants, Kenya National Assurance (2001) Limited and Chaka Agencies, entered into a lease agreement. The plaintiff defaulted on rent payments, leading to the defendants' declaration of goods under the guise of distress for rent.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff was in breach of the lease agreement
  2. Whether the defendants are entitled to the outstanding sums in rent arrears

Reasoning

The court considered the evidence and concluded that the plaintiff failed to consistently pay rent and related sums agreed upon, thus breaching the lease agreement.

Outcome

The court entered judgment in favor of the defendants, Kenya National Assurance (2001) Limited, and against the plaintiff, Owino Okeyo & Co. Advocates, in the sum of Kshs.2,002,167.14 together with costs of the suit and interest.

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the defendants on the amended counterclaim

Remedies

  • The plaintiff is ordered to pay the sum of Kshs.2,002,167.14 to the defendants

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap. 22 Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case