SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Patrick Mwenda & another v Benson Muturi Rwanda [2021] KEHC 3090 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3090 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3090
Citation
[2021] KEHC 3090 (KLR)
Decided
14 October 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a stay of execution granted by the trial courtCoramEDWARD M. MURIITHI
Holding

The application for stay of execution is denied

Facts

The applicants sought a stay of execution of a judgment in a civil case, claiming they were unable to pay the full amount due to the insurance limit of Ksh 3,000,000/=. The respondent opposed the application.

Issues

  1. Substantial loss if stay not granted
  2. Willingness to offer security
  3. Delay in filing application
  4. Limitation of damages under Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act

Reasoning

The applicants failed to comply with the conditions of the stay granted by the trial court and were not unsuccessful in their appeal. The court found the applicants' delay unreasonable and that substantial loss has not been proven.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution is denied

Orders

  • Stay of execution pending appeal
  • Payment of Ksh 3,000,000 to the respondent
  • Deposit of balance in court within 30 days
  • Lapse of stay if payment and deposit not made
  • Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal

Remedies

  • Payment of Ksh 3,000,000 to the respondent
  • Deposit of balance in court

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act
Cases cited (5)
  • Equity Bank Limited v Japhet Kubai Ikiamba & Another
  • National Industrial Credit Bank Ltd v Aquinas Francis Wasike & Another
  • Billow Hussein vs The Hon Attorney General & 3 Others
  • Law Society of Kenya vs the AG & 3 Others
  • Justus Mutiga & 2 Others vs Law Society of Kenya & Another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case