SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Philip Njoroge Kimani v Liberty Africa Technologies Limited & another [2021] KEHC 3423 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3423 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3423
Citation
[2021] KEHC 3423 (KLR)
Decided
7 October 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondent's motion to dismiss the PetitionCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The Court finds the Petition does not meet the threshold of a Constitutional Petition and is instead a contractual dispute.

Facts

The Petitioner, Philip Njoroge Kimani, sought access to revenue reports and statements from Liberty Africa Technologies Limited and Safaricom Limited regarding his musical works on the 'Skiza Tunes' platform. The Petitioner claimed these refusals violated his rights under Articles 35(1)(b) and 43 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

Issues

  1. Whether the Petition meets the threshold of a Constitutional Petition.
  2. Whether the Petitioner's right to access information has been infringed by the Respondents.

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the Petitioner failed to set out the provisions allegedly infringed and the manner of infringement in his petition, thus failing to meet the threshold for a Constitutional Petition. The Court also found that the Petitioner's claim is a contractual dispute rather than a constitutional one.

Outcome

The Petition is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v. Republic (1979) eKLR
  • Kiambu County Tenants Welfare Association v. Attorney General & another (2017) eKLR
Cases cited (2)
  • Anarita Karimi Njeru v. Republic (1979) eKLR
  • Kiambu County Tenants Welfare Association v. Attorney General & another (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case