SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Risper Kerubo Onsare v Vijay Kumar Saidha, Haria Rajesh Nemchad & Hanif Zulfikar Ahmed Hasham (Civil Case 11 of 2018) [2021] KEHC 4704 (KLR) (27 July 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KEHC 4704 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4704
Citation
[2021] KEHC 4704 (KLR)
Decided
27 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at KisiiCoramMadan
Holding

The court found that the defendants were lawful tenants and that the plaintiff's notices to terminate tenancy were not lawful. The court also found that the plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs sought.

Facts

The plaintiff, Risper Kerubo Onsare, is the registered proprietor of land parcel no. Kisii Town/Block 111/128 and the commercial and residential buildings erected thereon. The defendants, Vijay Kumar Saidha, Haria Rajesh Nemchad, and Hanif Zulfikar Ahmed Hasham, have been occupying the residential section of the plaintiff's premises for a long time. The plaintiff issued notices to the defendants demanding vacant possession of the premises on or before 31st July 2018, but the defendants did not vacate the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether this court has jurisdiction to determine the matter
  2. Whether the plaintiff was entitled to issue the Notices to terminate tenancy
  3. Whether the Notices dated 5th April 2018 issued by the plaintiff to terminate tenancy were lawful
  4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court held that the defendants were lawful tenants and that the plaintiff's notices to terminate tenancy were not lawful. The court also found that the plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs sought.

Outcome

Affirmed the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal.

Orders

  • Affirmed the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal.
  • Ordered the defendants to vacate the premises on or before 31st July 2018.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Nandlal Jivraj Shah & 2 others (all trading as Jivaco Agencies v Kingfisher Properties Limited Civil Appeal No.35 of 2015 [2015] eKLR
  • Jitendra Mathurdas Kahabar & 2 Others vs Fish and Meat Limited [1997] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case