Republic v Tigania East District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer & another Ex parte Joseph Mathita Ikirima; Nkunja Edward Mwenda (Interested Party) [2021] eKLR [2021] KEHC 5156 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 5156
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 5156 (KLR)
- Decided
- 14 July 2021
The court finds that the applicant's claims cannot be determined in the judicial review proceedings due to the need for a determination of the actual acreage claimed by the applicant before and after the objection proceedings.
Facts
The applicant, Joseph Mathita Ikirima, sought an order of mandamus to compel the respondent, Tigania East District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, to alter the adjudication records to conform with the findings of objection no. 1967 and record Land Parcel No. 391 Karama Adjudication Section measuring approximately 3.40 acres in his name. The interested party, Nkunja Edward Mwenda, claimed ownership of the land parcel measuring 1.35 acres.
Issues
- Whether the orders of mandamus, injunction, and eviction sought by the applicant are merited.
- Whether the respondent's actions were wrongful in giving the applicant 1.35 acres instead of 3 or 3.4 acres.
Reasoning
The court considers the scope of the judicial review remedy of mandamus and the applicable law, which is the Land Consolidation Act. The court notes that the applicant's claim is based on the acreage listed in the objection proceedings, but the actual acreage cannot be ascertained in the judicial review proceedings.
Outcome
The court denies the applicant's requests for mandamus, eviction, and injunction.
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Land Consolidation Act Cap 283
- Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (3)
- Kenya National Examinations Council vs. Republic Ex parte Geoffrey Gathenji Njoroge & Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
- Global Exhibitions Incorporated Limited V County Government of Vihiga
- Republic V Attorney General Ex Parte Italbuild Imports Limited
Loading judgment…