Eustace N Paul & 3 others v Juntus Paul Njeru Kangicu [2021] KEHC 5391 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 5391
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 5391 (KLR)
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for leave to amend memorandum of appeal
Holding
The court grants leave to amend the memorandum of appeal.
Facts
The appellants seek leave to amend their memorandum of appeal due to errors in the date of the judgment and lack of clarity in their grounds of appeal.
Issues
- Whether the amendments to the memorandum of appeal should be allowed
- Whether the appellants' lack of an advocate is a valid reason to amend the memorandum of appeal
Reasoning
The court considers that the amendments are not prejudicial to the respondent and that the errors in the date of the judgment do not affect the substance of the appeal.
Outcome
Leave to amend the memorandum of appeal granted
Orders
- Leave to amend the memorandum of appeal granted
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Civil Procedure Rules 2010
- Order 42, Rule 3
- Order 8, Rule 3
Cases cited (1)
- Uhuru Highway Development Ltd vs Central Bank of Kenya (2002) 1 EA 314
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…