SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Vincent Lusige v Republic [2021] KEHC 5507 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5507 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5507
Citation
[2021] KEHC 5507 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureAppeal from a judgment of Hon. Y.A Shikanda, Principal MagistrateCoramGikonyo, Korir, Hon. Adwera Onginjo
Holding

The court found that the denial of bond was prejudicial and punitive and reduced the bond to Kshs. 500,000/= with one surety each and in the alternative cash bail of Kshs. 200,000/= each.

Facts

The applicant, Vincent Lusige, sought a bond with surety and additional cash bail of Kshs. 200,000/=, which was objected to by the prosecution. The court found that the prosecution had not proved the accused were habitual offenders, part of a criminal gang, or had no fixed abode.

Issues

  1. Whether the prosecution had proved the accused were habitual offenders, part of a criminal gang, or had no fixed abode.
  2. Whether the denial of bond was prejudicial and punitive.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the prosecution had not proved the accused were habitual offenders, part of a criminal gang, or had no fixed abode. It also found that reliance on medical reports and statements of witnesses who had not testified was not appropriate.

Outcome

Affirmed with modifications

Orders

  • Bond of Kshs. 500,000/= with one surety each and in the alternative cash bail of Kshs. 200,000/= each

Remedies

  • The appellants are required to ensure that they do not interfere with witnesses and to attend court as and when required during their trial in the lower court.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • R. v. Dwight Sagray & 4 others [2013} eKLR
  • Republic v. Joktan Manyende & 2 others [2012] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case