SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Joan Chepkoech [2021] KEHC 5689 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5689 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5689
Citation
[2021] KEHC 5689 (KLR)
Decided
30 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminalPostureReview of BondCoramMUMBUA T. MATHEKA
Holding

The bond is reviewed to Kshs. 100,000/- with surety of similar amount. The uncle with a motorbike and the accused's father are to be the additional sureties.

Facts

The accused, Joan Chepkoech, was charged with Murder under sections 203 and 204 of the Penal Code. She was granted a bond of Kshs. 150,000/- with a surety of similar amount. During the last mention, she requested further review of the bond terms due to her relatives' inability to raise the bond.

Issues

  1. Nature of the offence
  2. Views of the victim
  3. Circumstances of the accused
  4. Accused's ability to raise the bond

Reasoning

The court considered the nature of the offence, the views of the victim, and the circumstances of the accused. The bond was reviewed to ensure the accused appears in court as required.

Outcome

The bond is reviewed to Kshs. 100,000/- with surety of similar amount.

Orders

  • The uncle with a motorbike may stand surety for her with the motorbike as security.
  • Her father will be the additional surety. He will only be required to avail a letter from the chief, confirming that they are indeed residents of that location, his full photograph and copy of his identity card.
  • The Deputy Registrar to assess the sureties accordingly.
  • Upon release and during the pendency of this case, the accused not go to Kamwaura where the offence was committed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Penal Code
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case