SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mary Joy Wangui Gitau v Umberto Paoletti & 2 others [2021] KEHC 6267 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6267 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6267
Citation
[2021] KEHC 6267 (KLR)
Decided
11 May 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for conservatory orders on a dispute over service chargeCoramHon. Justice R. Nyakundi
Holding

The court held that the dispute is commercial and the parties had provided for any dispute to be referred to arbitration. The court dismissed the preliminary objection.

Facts

Mary Joy Wangui Gitau applied for conservatory orders against Umberto Paoletti and Tonello Graziano regarding a service charge dispute over Villa Number 2 Bongo House in Mjanja Villas. The dispute arose due to the applicant's dissatisfaction with the manner of litigation and the respondents raised a preliminary objection.

Issues

  1. Arbitration clause in lease agreement
  2. Jurisdiction of the court to hear the application

Reasoning

The court analyzed the arbitration clauses in the lease agreement and applied international arbitration principles to determine that the dispute should be resolved through arbitration.

Outcome

The preliminary objection was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Arbitration Act No. 4 of 1995
  • International Arbitration Act 2017
Cases cited (7)
  • Rogers Wireless Inc. V Muroff (2007) 2 S.C.R. 921
  • Corporate Insurance Co. V Wachira (1995-1998) 1 EA 20
  • International Consultancy Co. Ltd suing by a Power of Attorney No. P/A 65175/1 of Apex Vision Ltd V Telkom Kenya & Another (2019) eKLR
  • Musimba Investment Ltd Vs Nokia Corporation (2019) eKLR
  • Anne Mwangi Hinga Vs Victoria Njoki Gathara(2009)eKLR
  • UAP Provincial Insurance Co. Ltd V Michael John Beckett
  • Eunice Soko Mlagui V Suresh Parmar & 4 Others (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case