SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

May Susan Spinks & another v Ralph Graeme Spinks & another; Ben Zebulan Spinks & another (Interested Parties) [2021] KEHC 6748 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6748 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6748
Citation
[2021] KEHC 6748 (KLR)
Decided
27 May 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramJOEL NGUGI
Holding

The Court grants leave to the 1st Applicant to commence action against the two Respondents on behalf of the Company, but the dispute must be resolved through mandatory arbitration under Clause 60 of the Articles and Memorandum of Association.

Facts

The Company was incorporated by the 1st Applicant, 1st Respondent, and 2nd Respondent. They ran the Company together until their divorce in June 2019. The 1st Applicant claims the Respondents are misappropriating the Company's finances and wasting assets.

Issues

  1. Whether the 1st Applicant and her children are directors of the Company
  2. Whether the Company's accounts and finances are being wasted by the Respondents
  3. Whether the dispute between the parties should be resolved through arbitration

Reasoning

The Court finds that the allegations are bona fide and that the issues may dissipate if status quo is not preserved. The Court orders that status quo be maintained until the arbitration is heard and determined.

Outcome

The matter is referred to arbitration.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the 1st Applicant to commence action against the two Respondents on behalf of the Company
  • Status quo maintained respecting corporate affairs of the Company until the arbitration is heard and determined
  • All further proceedings are stayed and referred to arbitration

Remedies

  • Leave granted to the 1st Applicant to commence action against the two Respondents on behalf of the Company
  • Status quo maintained respecting corporate affairs of the Company until the arbitration is heard and determined
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case