SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

West Media Limited & another v Augustine Wangui Muriithi [2021] KEHC 6865 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6865 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6865
Citation
[2021] KEHC 6865 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramS.N Riechi
Holding

The application is allowed with conditions

Facts

The appellants sought a stay of execution of a judgment and decree in a civil suit, claiming irreparable loss and inability to recover the decretal sum if the appeal fails.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellants have met the conditions set out in Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  2. Whether the application is merited

Reasoning

The court found that the appellants have met the conditions for a stay, but the respondent is entitled to enjoy the fruits of his judgment.

Outcome

Appeal allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Applicant to deposit the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning account within 30 days
  • In default, execution to proceed
  • Applicant to prepare and serve the Record of Appeal within 60 days

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of the decree pending appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Article 159(2) (d) of the Constitution
  • Sections 1A, 1B, 3, 3A and 65 of the Civil procedure Act
  • Order 51 Rule 1, Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • Stanley Mugweru Muchira & 2 Ors Vs John Muthike Muchira (2020)eKLR
  • Wilfred Nyawira Maina V Peterson Onyingo Gichana (2015)eKLR
  • Josephat Nikasio Vs Donald Masika (2020)eKLR
  • Kenya Hotel Properties Limited V Willesden Investments Limited (2007) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case