SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Directline Assurance Company Ltd v Wilson Wanyoike Njoroge [2021] KEHC 688 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 688 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
688
Citation
[2021] KEHC 688 (KLR)
Decided
30 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Chief Magistrates CourtCoramJ. K. Sergon
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.

Facts

The respondent filed an action against the appellant for damages resulting from a road traffic accident involving a third party. The respondent had a valid insurance policy with the appellant, and the respondent agreed to shoulder 40% of the liability. The appellant paid the plaintiff a sum of Ksh.3,000,000, leaving a balance of Ksh.1,025,600. The respondent filed a declaratory suit against the appellant to compel it to settle the outstanding balance.

Issues

  1. Whether Section 5(b)(iv) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act is applicable to the instant claim against the respondent.
  2. Whether the trial court erred in holding that the appellant is liable to settle the decretal sum of Ksh.4,025,600 and in compelling the appellant to refund Ksh.1,025,600.

Reasoning

The amendment to the Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act, which caps a claim by a single third party at Ksh.3,000,000, does not apply retrospectively to the respondent's claim against the appellant. The insurer was under a mandatory statutory liability to first settle the judgment sum to the person entitled to the benefit of the judgment.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Act
  • Insurance (Motor Vehicle Third Party Risks) Amendment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case