SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tahir Sheikh Said & 2 others v Maria Njeri Muturi [2021] KEHC 7934 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7934 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7934
Citation
[2021] KEHC 7934 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of Hon. J.M. Macharia in Garsen PMCC No. 86 of 2010CoramHon., The Acting
Holding

The appellate court found that the learned trial magistrate's assessment of general damages at Ksh.100,000/= was not inordinately high or low and represented a reasonable estimate of the plaintiff's general damages.

Facts

On 2/6/2010, the respondent was a fare-paying passenger in the appellants' motor-vehicle registration number KAZ 681L. An accident occurred while the driver was negotiating a corner at Kona Mbaya, resulting in the respondent sustaining injuries to the ribs, back, and neck.

Issues

  1. whether the learned trial magistrate's assessment of general damages at Ksh.100,000/= was erroneous and excessive
  2. the exercise of discretion on the award of damages

Reasoning

The court held that the amount awarded for pain and suffering and loss of amenities cannot be precisely calculated and is solely discretionary on the part of the trial court. The court emphasized the discretion of the trial judge to award a reasonable sum based on the evidence and similar cases.

Outcome

The appeal was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (6)
  • Joseph Omondi Onyango vs Busia Outgrowers Co. Ltd
  • Butt vs Khan
  • Wells v Wells
  • CCA Limited vs Julius Jeffery CA No. 10 of 2003 SVG
  • Sheikh Mustaq Hassan v Nathan Mwangi Kamau Transporters & 5 Others
  • Jane Chelagat Bor v Adnrew Otieno Onduu
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case