SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Johnson Mainga Mogaka v Kenya Power and Lighting Company (Environment & Land Case 359 of 2014) [2021] KEHC 8407 (KLR) (11 March 2021) (Judgment)

[2021] KEHC 8407 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8407
Citation
[2021] KEHC 8407 (KLR)
Decided
11 March 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTrespass and DamagesPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramE. Obaga
Holding

The Court finds that the Defendant trespassed onto the Plaintiff's land and the trespass is continuous.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Johnson Mainga Mogaka, claims to be the registered owner of a parcel of land known as L.R. NO: WEST MUGIRANGO/BOGICHORA/397 in Nyamira County, Kenya. The Defendant, Kenya Power and Lighting Company, entered the suit property and cut down trees, cleared the ground, and installed a power transmission line without the Plaintiff's consent.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant trespassed on the suit property
  2. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to damages for the trespass

Reasoning

The Defendant did not obtain the Plaintiff's consent to enter the land and lay the electric supply lines. The provisions of the Energy Act require prior permission and a notice accompanied by a statement of particulars.

Outcome

The Defendant is found to have trespassed on the Plaintiff's land.

Orders

  • Judgment entered against the Defendant for trespass and damages

Remedies

  • Damages for trespass
  • Interest for damages

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Energy Act, Cap 314
  • Trespass Act, Cap 294
  • Land Act, 2012
Cases cited (2)
  • Black's Law Dictionary 10th Edition
  • Otundo & Associates Valuers valuation report
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case