SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v VWW [2021] KEHC 903 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 903 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
903
Citation
[2021] KEHC 903 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from the original Sexual Offences Case No. 8 of 2018 at the Chief Magistrate’s Court BungomaCoramAburili, Riechi
Holding

The respondent was found guilty of incest and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years.

Facts

The respondent, VWW, was charged with incest and indecent act with a child aged 14 years old. He was also charged with a sexual offense related to his position of authority at a school.

Issues

  1. To prove the offence of incest, the prosecution was required to prove the act of sexual intercourse with a person within the degree of consanguinity where marriage is prohibited.
  2. For purposes of sentencing, the age of the victim has to be proved.

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent, who was the complainant's half (step) father, committed incest with the complainant, a child aged 14 years old.

Outcome

The respondent was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years.

Orders

  • The respondent was found guilty of incest and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years.

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Section 20 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act
  • Section 22 of the Sexual Offences Act
  • Section 11(1) of Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Section 24 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
Cases cited (1)
  • Francis Omuroni -vs- Uganda, Criminal Appeal N
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case