SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

National Housing Corporation v Custom General Construction Limited [2021] KEHC 9300 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9300 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9300
Citation
[2021] KEHC 9300 (KLR)
Decided
5 February 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeApplication to Set Aside Arbitration AwardPostureApplicant seeks to set aside an arbitration awardCoramD. S. MAJAN, D.S. MAJANJA, Law, Nyamu, Okwany, Tuiyott, Warsame
Holding

The time for filing the application to set aside the award starts to run from the date the award is received, which is when the Arbitrator delivers the award to the parties.

Facts

Custom General Construction Limited won a tender for the construction of the Kisii High Rise Housing Scheme Phase I. The parties entered into a contract, but disputes arose over final accounts leading to arbitration. The National Housing Corporation seeks to set aside the award.

Issues

  1. When does the time for filing the application to set aside the award start to run?
  2. What is the meaning of 'received' in the context of the Arbitration Act?

Reasoning

The court relies on section 35(3) of the Arbitration Act and previous cases to determine that the time for filing the application to set aside the award starts to run from the date the award is received, not when the parties are notified of the award.

Outcome

The application to set aside the award is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Arbitration Act
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Cases cited (6)
  • Ann Mumbi Hinga v Victoria Njoki Gathara
  • Ezra Odondi Opar v Insurance Company of East Africa Limited
  • Nyutu Agrovet Limited vs. Airtel Networks Kenya Limited
  • Transworld Safaris Limited v Eagle Aviation Limited
  • Mahican Investments Limited and 3 Others v Giovanni Gaida and 80 Others
  • Mahinder Singh Channa vs. Nelson Muguku & Another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case