SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dominic Inziani v Republic [2021] KEHC 964 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 964 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
964
Citation
[2021] KEHC 964 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBail ApplicationPostureApplication for Bond and/or BailCoramL. N. MUTENDE
Holding

The court grants the applicant bond on the following terms: a bond of Kenya Shillings Eight Hundred Thousand (Kshs. 800,000/-) with a surety in a similar sum; he is deterred from communicating directly or indirectly with Susan, the sister to the deceased, until she testifies.

Facts

The applicant Dominic Inziani is accused of a criminal offence. He is a father of two minors and a sole breadwinner. He has a fixed known place of abode in Kawangware, Nairobi. He has no passport and is a pastor at Green Yellow Church. His first wife relocated from Kawangware to an unknown place after his arrest.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has a right to bail
  2. Whether the applicant is a flight risk
  3. Whether the applicant has interfered with witnesses
  4. Whether the applicant's conduct during arrest justifies denying bail

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant has a right to bail and that there are no compelling reasons to deny him bail. The court also considers the strength of the evidence and the principle of presumption of innocence.

Outcome

Grant of Bond

Orders

  • Bond of Kenya Shillings Eight Hundred Thousand (Kshs. 800,000/-) with a surety in a similar sum
  • Deterrence from communicating with Susan, the sister to the deceased, until she testifies

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Article 49 (1) (h) of the Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic vs. Dwight Sagaray & 4 others (2013) eKLR
  • Republic vs. Danson Mgunya & Another [2010] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case