SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

National Bank Of Kenyao v John Kiprono Martin Langat T/A Allied Importex Enterprises & 2 others (Civil Case 509 of 1995) [2022] KEHC 10059 (KLR) (7 July 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEHC 10059 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
10059
Citation
[2022] KEHC 10059 (KLR)
Decided
7 July 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramHK CHEMITEI
Holding

Judgement is entered against the defendants jointly and severally as per the plaint dated 7th August 1995, together with costs and interest.

Facts

The plaintiff, National Bank of Kenya, filed a suit against the defendants, John Kiprono Martin Langat T/A Allied Importex Enterprises and two others, seeking to recover a loan and overdraft facility amounting to Kshs. 3,076,902.25. The plaintiff also sought to recover Kshs. 1,000,000 guaranteed by the 3rd defendant and Kshs. 100,000 guaranteed by the 4th defendant. The defendants did not pay the loan and the court entered judgement against them.

Issues

  1. Recovery of loan and overdraft facility
  2. Recovery of guaranteed amounts

Reasoning

The court found that the defendants did not deny receiving the loan or guaranteeing it, and that their defences were merely general denials. The court also noted that the defendants were fully aware of the default and had been issued with appropriate notices.

Outcome

Judgement in favour of the plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgement entered against the defendants jointly and severally as per the plaint dated 7th August 1995, together with costs and interest

Remedies

  • Recovery of loan and overdraft facility
  • Recovery of guaranteed amounts
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case