Prof. Tom Ojienda & Associates v County Secretary, Nairobi City County & another (Judicial Review Application 313 of 2019) [2022] KEHC 11619 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (25 March 2022) (Ruling)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 11619
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 11619 (KLR)
- Decided
- 25 March 2022
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for contempt of court and for costsCoramNGAAH
Holding
The application is dismissed as premature and misconceived
Facts
The applicant, Prof. Tom Ojienda & Associates, had an advocate/client bill of costs taxed against the respondents. The applicant subsequently filed an application to have the certificate of taxation converted to a judgment, which was allowed. The respondents did not pay the decree.
Issues
- Whether the respondents were served with the order
- Whether the order was served with a warning of contempt of court
- Whether the respondents were present when the judgment was given
Reasoning
The order was not served with a warning of contempt of court and the respondents were not present when the judgment was given.
Outcome
The application is dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed
- No order as to costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…