SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shah and Parekh v Kenindia Assurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 492 of 2018) [2022] KEHC 14775 (KLR) (Civ) (28 October 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEHC 14775 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
14775
Citation
[2022] KEHC 14775 (KLR)
Decided
28 October 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureRespondent seeks to abandon right to file notice of objection and reference, applicant seeks to proceed with costs as taxedCoramCW MEOLI, NCA
Holding

Court allows applicant's motion with costs, renders respondent's motion moot

Facts

Applicant brought suit to recover professional fees from respondent. Respondent sought to enlarge time to file a reference, which was granted. Applicant seeks to proceed with costs as taxed.

Issues

  1. Whether respondent has abandoned its right to file a notice of objection and reference
  2. Whether court should intervene in respondent's inaction

Reasoning

Court finds respondent's inaction speaks louder than intent to challenge costs, and intervenes to allow applicant's motion.

Outcome

Motion allowed with costs

Orders

  • Respondent's motion is rendered moot

Remedies

  • Allowance of applicant's motion with costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Abok James Odera T/A A.J Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira T/A Machira & Co. Advocates [2013] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Korir Arap Salat v IEBC and 7 Others [2014] eKLR
  • Katuturi's case
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case