SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Okoye v Republic (Criminal Appeal E072 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 14971 (KLR) (Crim) (18 October 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEHC 14971 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
14971
Citation
[2022] KEHC 14971 (KLR)
Decided
18 October 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentenceCoramJM BWONWONG'A
Holding

The appeal is partially successful, and the appellant is to serve ten years less the pre-trial custody period, with concurrent sentences for the two counts of trafficking.

Facts

The appellant was charged with trafficking in narcotic drugs and was convicted and sentenced to a fine and imprisonment.

Issues

  1. Consecutive sentences for two counts of trafficking
  2. Pre-trial custody period not considered in sentencing
  3. Sentencing from date of plea rather than conviction date

Reasoning

The court found the trial court erred in ordering consecutive sentences for the two counts of trafficking and in failing to consider the pre-trial custody period. The sentences are to run from the date of conviction.

Outcome

Partial success for the appellant

Orders

  • Ten years imprisonment with concurrent sentences for the two counts of trafficking
  • Pre-trial custody period of one year and nine months deducted from the sentence
  • Sentencing from the date of conviction rather than plea date

Remedies

  • Recommendation for deportation to Nigeria upon completion of sentence

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Control) Act No. 4 of 1994
  • Penal Code (Cap 63) Laws of Kenya
  • Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya
  • 2010 Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Bernard Kimani Gacheru v Republic [2002] eKLR
  • Shadrack Kipkoech Kogo vs Republic, Eldoret Criminal Appeal No. 253 of 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case