SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board;Ex parte:Madison General Insurance Kenya Limited ;Vice Chancellor, Kenyatta University & another(Interested Parties) [2022] KEHC 1683 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 1683 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1683
Citation
[2022] KEHC 1683 (KLR)
Decided
8 March 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondent's decision quashedCoramNGAA Jairus
Holding

The respondent's decision to review the award after the contract was signed was procedurally improper and lacked jurisdiction.

Facts

Kenyatta University tendered for medical insurance cover services. The tender was awarded to the applicant. The 2nd interested party requested for review of the award, but the respondent cancelled the contract after the procurement contract was signed.

Issues

  1. Respondent's decision to review the award after the contract was signed was procedurally improper.
  2. Respondent lacked jurisdiction to review the award after the contract was signed.

Reasoning

The respondent misinterpreted section 167(4) of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015, which deprived it of jurisdiction to determine a request for review after a procurement contract was signed.

Outcome

The respondent's decision is quashed.

Orders

  • An order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board in Review Application No. 155/2021 in regard to TENDER NO. KU/TNDR/S/015/PM/C/2021-2022 for provision of medical insurance cover services inpatient and outpatient cover.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case