SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bethwel Kimutai v Equity Bank (K) Ltd & another [2022] KEHC 1995 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 1995 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1995
Citation
[2022] KEHC 1995 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication for Interlocutory InjunctionCoramR. Nyakundi
Holding

The application for an interlocutory injunction is accordingly refused with costs.

Facts

The plaintiff, Bethwel Kimutai, approached Equity Bank (K) Ltd for a banking facility of Kshs. 10,850,000 and offered TITLE NO. NANDI/KAMOBO/1122 as security. Later, he approached the bank for another facility of Kshs. 30,100,000 and offered TITLE NO. CHEPSIRO/KIBUSWA BLOCK 1/KELCHINET/223 as security. Both charges were registered and the bank disbursed the funds. The plaintiff filed an application challenging the statutory power of sale due to the lack of certain notices.

Issues

  1. Whether the application has met the threshold for an injunction
  2. Whether the applicant has a prima facie case
  3. Whether the balance of convenience lies in not granting the injunction

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant has only settled a small portion of the debt and has unclean hands. The balance of convenience lies in not granting the injunction as the applicant has not fully settled the debt and the bank would lose its security if the property is sold.

Outcome

Denied

Orders

  • Application for interlocutory injunction refused with costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Land Act No. 6 of 2012
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Auctioneers’ Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Giella v Cassman Brown Co. Ltd 1973 E.A. 358
  • Thathy vs Middle East Bank (K) Ltd (2002) 1 KLR 595
  • American Cyanamid Co. v Ethicon, Inc. 415 U.S. 223 (1974)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case