SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Red Roof Inn Hotel Limited v Attorney General & another [2022] KEHC 2151 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 2151 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2151
Citation
[2022] KEHC 2151 (KLR)
Decided
21 February 2022
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureRespondent's appeal from a decision of the High Court of Kenya, NairobiCoramH. I. ONG’UDI
The Court finds that it has jurisdiction to determine the issues raised on the functions of the Government and that Sections 66 as read with Section 69(1)(a) of the Tourism Act, No. 28 of 2011 are unconstitutional.

Facts

The petitioner, Red Roof Inn Hotel Limited, claims the Tourism Act, 2011, contravenes Article 47 of the Constitution by appropriating the County Government's function of local tourism to a body that is not the County Government. The petitioner asserts that it has paid the tourism levy to the Nairobi City County Government and that the Tourism Fund's officers have sought the levy from its premises.

Issues

  • Whether this Court has jurisdiction to determine the issues raised on the functions of the Government
  • Whether Sections 66 as read with Section 69(1)(a) of the Tourism Act, No. 28 of 2011 are unconstitutional
  • Whether the 2nd Respondent violated the Petitioner's right under Article 47 of the Constitution

Reasoning

The Court addresses jurisdiction and constitutional issues raised by the petition. It finds that the petition raises a constitutional issue that falls under the Court's jurisdiction and that the Tourism Act contravenes the Constitution.

Outcome

The Court declares Sections 66 as read with Section 69(1)(a) of the Tourism Act, No. 28 of 2011 unconstitutional.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Tourism Act, 2011
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (2)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
  • A.O.O & 6 Others v Attorney General & Another
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case