SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

In re Estate of Malikit Singh (Deceased) [2022] KEHC 2605 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 2605 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2605
Citation
[2022] KEHC 2605 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureApplication for confirmation of grant of letters of administrationCoramM. THANDE
Holding

The grant of letters of administration is confirmed, and the estate is to be distributed to the four sons in equal shares.

Facts

The deceased, Malikit Singh, died intestate in 1996. His widow, Parsini, and four sons (Ragbir, Balbir, Ajit, and Manjit) were beneficiaries. The estate's assets include a property known as L. R. No. 209/1904. Balbir was convicted of tax fraud in the UK and dissolved a company he was a director of.

Issues

  1. Confirmation of grant of letters of administration
  2. Legal capacity of protestor to represent the estate
  3. Delivery of records to the court

Reasoning

The court dismissed the protestor's affidavit of protest and the application for confirmation of grant, finding that the protestor lacked legal capacity to represent the estate and that the records were public documents to be held by the Nairobi Lands Registrar.

Outcome

Grant of letters of administration confirmed

Orders

  • Affidavit of protest dismissed
  • Grant of letters of administration confirmed
  • Estate distributed to four sons in equal shares
  • Application dismissed

Remedies

  • Grant of letters of administration confirmed
  • Estate distributed to four sons in equal shares

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Probate and Administration Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • In re Estate of Giovanni Forino (Deceased) [2021] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case