SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Icea Lion General Insurance Company Ltd v Pamela Atieno Odundo [2022] KEHC 27052 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 27052 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
27052
Citation
[2022] KEHC 27052 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivil AppealPostureRespondent/applicant moved the court by way of Notice of Motion seeking orders to release a deposit and other relief.CoramKIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
The court ordered the respondent to issue a full and accurate statement of the fixed deposit account and to bear the costs of the application. The deposit was not released, and the appellant was given a chance to pursue their intended appeal in the Court of Appeal.

Facts

The respondent/applicant sought the release of a deposit of Kshs.537,610.00 from a joint fixed deposit account in the names of Onyinkwa & Co. Advocates and Maube Muyeya and Associates at Mayfair Bank Limited, Eldoret Branch. The deposit was made to ensure the appeal was heard and determined.

Issues

  • Whether the application is competent and merited.
  • Whether the applicant has suffered substantial loss and damage if the deposit is not released.
  • Whether the applicant has furnished security to cater for any sum that may be paid to him.
  • Whether the intended appeal is an arguable appeal with overwhelming chances of success.

Reasoning

The appeal was determined on 29th June, 2021, and the conditions for depositing the money have expired. The court gave the appellant a chance to pursue their appeal in the Court of Appeal.

Outcome

The deposit was not released.

Orders

  • The respondent to issue a full and accurate statement of the fixed deposit account.
  • The costs of the application to be borne by the appellant.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case