SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KKB v SCM & 5 others (Constitutional Petition 014 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 289 (KLR) (22 April 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEHC 289 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
289
Citation
[2022] KEHC 289 (KLR)
Decided
22 April 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondents' Notice of Preliminary Objection and Petitioner's Notice of MotionCoramEbrahim, IL, JM MATIVO, Matthews
Holding

The court dismissed the 1st and 2nd Respondents' Notice of Preliminary Objection and held that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the Petition.

Facts

The 1st Respondent is a son of the 2nd Respondent, the 3rd Respondent is the Petitioner's biological father, and the 4th, 5th, and 6th Respondents are the Petitioner's biological brothers. The dispute centers on whether there was a 'marriage' between the Petitioner and the 1st Respondent, and if so, whether it was consensual, lawful, or forced.

Issues

  1. Whether there existed a 'marriage' between the Petitioner and the 1st Respondent
  2. Whether the 'marriage' was consensual, lawful, or forced

Reasoning

The court ruled that the issues raised in the Petition do not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court, Family Division, and that the court has the authority to hear the case.

Outcome

The court dismissed the 1st and 2nd Respondents' Notice of Preliminary Objection.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • 2007] 28 ILJ 133 (CC)
  • {2002} 23 ILJ 81 (CC)
  • {2001} (1) SA 912 (CC)
  • 2001 (1) SA 912 (CC)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case