SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission v Kinyua & 2 others; Njenga (Interested Party); Sumac Microfinance Bank Limited (Objector) (Civil Case 461 of 2007) [2022] KEHC 68 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (31 January 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KEHC 68 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
68
Citation
[2022] KEHC 68 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment in a civil caseCoramD.S. MAJAN, DAS MAJANJA, Otieno, ST DEFENDANT, JOHNSON
Holding

The court's orders are not functus omissus and the Interested Party's application is not dismissed.

Facts

The Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission filed a suit against three defendants for recovery of public money allegedly wrongfully acquired. The court entered judgment in favor of the commission and granted various orders, including an injunction and a stay of proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the court's orders of March 12, 2021 should be vacated and the Interested Party's application dismissed.
  2. Whether the court is functus omissus after rendering judgment in 2011

Reasoning

The court held that the Interested Party is not obligated to furnish an undertaking as the injunction application to the Court of Appeal has not been withdrawn or failed, and the court retains its power to facilitate compliance with the judgment.

Outcome

The court's orders are not vacated and the Interested Party's application is not dismissed.

Orders

  • Injunction to stop the sale of the property pending hearing and determination of the appeal at the Court of Appeal
  • Stay of proceedings in this suit

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Telkom Kenya Ltd vs John Ochanda
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case