SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Ex Parte Madison General Insurance Kenya Ltd; Accounting Officer (KEBS) & another (Interested Parties) [2022] KEHC 690 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 690 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
690
Citation
[2022] KEHC 690 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application seeking orders to quash a decision and review documentsCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs.

Facts

Madison General Insurance Kenya Ltd was a participant in a tender for staff medical insurance cover. The Public Procurement Administrative Review Board (Respondent) determined that CIC Group Insurance (2nd Interested Party) was the successful bidder. The Ex parte Applicant (Applicant) appealed the decision.

Issues

  1. procedural impropriety
  2. legitimate expectation
  3. irrationality
  4. unreasonableness

Reasoning

The Respondent's decision was not procedurally impropriety, the Applicant's legitimate expectation did not collapse, and the Respondent's decision was not irrational or unreasonable.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Republic v Kenyatta University Ex parte Martha Waihuini Ndungu
  • Jane Kiongo & 15 Others v Laikipia University & 6 Others
  • Konton Trading Limited v Kenya Revenue Authority & 3 Others
  • Republic v Council of Legal Education & 2 others Ex Parte Mitchelle Njeri Thiongo Nduati
  • Supreme Court in the Petition No. 17 of 2015 John Florence Maritime Services Limited & another v Cabinet Secretary, Transport and Infrastructure & 3 others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case