SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

PMK v Republic (Criminal Appeal 193 of 2017) [2023] KEHC 19832 (KLR) (6 July 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEHC 19832 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
19832
Citation
[2023] KEHC 19832 (KLR)
Decided
6 July 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentence for attempted rapeCoramCM KARIUKI, KLR Odunga
The court will not include the time spent in remand and will not reduce the sentence.

Facts

The appellant was convicted and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for attempted rape by a subordinate court. He appealed but withdrew the appeal and instead sought a sentence review. He is now seeking to include the time spent in remand and reduce his sentence.

Issues

  • Whether the appellant has established a case for revision
  • Whether the court should include the time spent in remand and reduce the sentence

Reasoning

The court will not include the time spent in remand as it was not part of the proceedings and the appellant did not appeal this aspect. The court will not reduce the sentence as it would prejudice the accused person.

Outcome

The court will not include the time spent in remand and will not reduce the sentence.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Sexual Offences Act No 3 of 2006
Cases cited (3)
  • Joseph Nduvi Mbuvi v Republic
  • Public Prosecutor v. Muhari Bin Mohd Jani And Another
  • Stephen Lesinko
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case