SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbatia v Mburu Joseph Braimoh Ndungu t/a Riggha & Mburu Advocates (Civil Case E048 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3530 (KLR) (Civ) (28 April 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEHC 3530 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3530
Citation
[2023] KEHC 3530 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an interlocutory judgmentCoramAA VISRAM, Mustafa
Holding

The plaintiff's claims are dismissed as the cause of action is based on breach of contract and not tort, and the plaintiff is not entitled to general damages.

Facts

The plaintiff, Serah Njeri Mbatia, claimed that her former advocate, Mburu Joseph Braimoh Ndungu, acted negligently in a sale and purchase of her husband's property, resulting in a loss of Kshs.27,902,814.

Issues

  1. Breach of contract
  2. Professional negligence
  3. Statute of limitations

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff's claim was time-barred due to the statute of limitations and that the cause of action was based on breach of contract, not tort. General damages are not recoverable for breach of contract.

Outcome

The plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation of Actions Act CAP 22
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • Consolata Anyango Ouma vs. South Nyanza Sugar Co. Ltd (2015)eKLR
  • Kenya Tourist Development Corporation v Sundowner Lodge Limited (2018) eKLR
  • Dharamshi v Karsan (1974) EA 41
  • Provincial Insurance Co. EA Ltd v Mordechai Mwanga Nandwa (KSM Civil Appeal No 179 of 1995)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case