SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Nderitu & another (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E007 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10474 (KLR) (27 August 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEHC 10474 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
10474
Citation
[2024] KEHC 10474 (KLR)
Decided
27 August 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureAppeal out of timeCoramLM NJUGUNA
Holding

The application has merit and is hereby allowed as prayed.

Facts

The respondents were discharged by the trial court after the complainant failed to appear in court. The applicant requested for certified copies of proceedings for purposes of appeal but the same were availed on 30th January 2024, when the window of appeal had already closed.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the discharge of the respondents.
  2. Whether the petition of appeal should be deemed as duly filed.

Reasoning

The court finds that the delay in filing the appeal is due to the late receipt of certified copies of proceedings and that the applicant has demonstrated promptness in its intentions thus far.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The appeal is deemed as properly filed and within the prescribed time.
  • The applicant/appellant to file the record of appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • The appeal to be prosecuted within 90 days failing which it shall stand dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (4)
  • Michael Mukwana Wanyonyi v. Republic (2021) eKLR
  • Republic v. Ahmed Fakir Mohamed (2021) eKLR
  • Samson Owiti Otambo v Republic (2018) eKLR
  • Michael Onyango Owala v. Republic (2018) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case