SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

M’mweti v District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Igembe District & 2 others; M’mweti & 19 others (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 7 of 2010) [2024] KEHC 3236 (KLR) (4 April 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEHC 3236 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3236
Citation
[2024] KEHC 3236 (KLR)
Decided
4 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondent's appeal from a lower court decisionCoramCK YANO, Lenaola, Mabeya, Mwita
Holding

The petition meets the threshold of a constitutional petition.

Facts

The petition involves alleged violations of the right to property guaranteed under Article 40 of the Constitution by the District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Igembe District and other officials.

Issues

  1. Whether the petition meets the threshold of a constitutional petition.
  2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs sought.
  3. Who bears the cost of the petition.

Reasoning

The court emphasized that a constitutional petition challenges breaches of constitutional provisions or violations of rights and fundamental freedoms granted by the constitution. The court cited Anarita Karimi Njeru v Republic (1979) and Mumo Matemo v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 others [2013] to support the need for precise and comprehensive pleadings.

Outcome

The petition meets the threshold of a constitutional petition.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Article 22(1) of the Constitution
  • Article 159 of the Constitution
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act (Cap 9)
Cases cited (1)
  • Mumo Matemo v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 others [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case