SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Wanyoike t/a Promise (Mwanake Luxury) Coach & 2 others v Abdul (Civil Appeal E007 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 5913 (KLR) (27 May 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEHC 5913 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5913
Citation
[2024] KEHC 5913 (KLR)
Decided
27 May 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and order of the Lodwar High CourtCoramRN NYAKUNDI
The court granted the stay of execution pending appeal.

Facts

James Wanyoike t/a Promise (Mwanake Luxury) Coach and two other applicants appealed against a judgment and order of Kshs. 306,550 plus costs and interests, seeking a stay of execution pending appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the applicants have met the conditions necessary to grant a stay pending appeal.
  • Whether substantial loss may result to the applicants unless the order is made.

Reasoning

The court considered the principles of granting or refusing a stay of execution pending appeal and the applicants' claim of substantial loss.

Outcome

The court granted the stay of execution pending appeal.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Kshs. 306,550 plus costs and interests pending the hearing and determination of this application inter-parties.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Kshs. 306,550 plus costs and interests pending the hearing and determination of LODWAR HCCA No. E007 of 2024.
  • Allow the applicants to furnish the court with security in the form of a Bank guarantee from the Family Bank.
  • Provide for the costs of this application.

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Kshs. 306,550 plus costs and interests pending the hearing and determination of this application inter-parties.
  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Kshs. 306,550 plus costs and interests pending the hearing and determination of LODWAR HCCA No. E007 of 2024.
  • Allow the applicants to furnish the court with security in the form of a Bank guarantee from the Family Bank.
  • Provide for the costs of this application.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (2)
  • Butt vs Rent Restriction Tribunal [1979]
  • Shell Ltd vs Kibiru and Another [1986]
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case