SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nabiriki v Republic (Criminal Appeal E033 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 754 (KLR) (31 January 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEHC 754 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
754
Citation
[2024] KEHC 754 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentenceCoramDK KEMEI
Holding

The appeal succeeds only to the extent that the sentence will commence from the date of arrest. The sentence of 15 years imprisonment is upheld and that the same shall commence from the date of arrest namely 9.2.2018.

Facts

The appellant, Caleb Nabiriki, pleaded guilty to charges of delement and indecent act with a child under the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006. The complainant was 17 years old at the time of the incident. The appellant befriended the complainant and had sex with her on several occasions, leading to her pregnancy and the birth of a child.

Issues

  1. Whether the sentence of 15 years imprisonment is harsh and should be reduced
  2. Whether the period spent in remand before conclusion of the case should be considered
  3. Whether the appellant has reformed while in prison and should be given another chance in life

Reasoning

The court found the sentence reasonable, appropriate, and commensurate with the appellant's blame worthiness. The period spent in custody must be factored, and the sentence will be adjusted accordingly.

Outcome

Appeal successful to the extent that the sentence commences from the date of arrest.

Orders

  • The sentence of 15 years imprisonment is upheld and will commence from the date of arrest (9.2.2018).

Authorities cited

Legislation (5)
  • Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 8 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Section 8 (4) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006
  • Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (1)
  • Benard Kimani Gacheru -vs- R (2002) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case