SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Transport & Lifting Services Limited v Mbaja & another (Suing as the legal representatives of the Estate of Barack Mbaja Dawa). (Civil Appeal E104 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 7554 (KLR) (19 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEHC 7554 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7554
Citation
[2024] KEHC 7554 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2024
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivil AppealPostureFirst AppealCoramA., SCOVIA ATIENO MBA, ESTATE OF BARACK MBA, Hancox Ag, Kneller, Majanja, P., RE ABURILI
The Court found the apportionment of liability to be fair and reasonable, and the award of quantum to be just.

Facts

Transport & Lifting Services Limited sued Scovia Atieno mbaja and Dismas Dawa Dawa for general and special damages under the Fatal Accidents Act and the Law Reform Act following a road traffic accident involving the deceased Barack Mbaja Dawa.

Issues

  • Whether or not the apportionment of liability was fair and reasonable in the circumstances of this case.
  • Whether or not the award of quantum was unjustified in the circumstances of this case so as to warrant interference by this court.

Reasoning

The Court re-evaluated the evidence and found the trial court's apportionment of liability to be fair and reasonable, and the award of quantum to be just.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Khambi and Another v Mahithi and Another [1968] EA 70
  • Mahendra M Malde v George M Angira Civil Appeal No. 12 of 1981
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case