SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mombasa Khushi Motors Company Limited v Mbuthia & another (Civil Application E019 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 804 (KLR) (30 January 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEHC 804 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
804
Citation
[2024] KEHC 804 (KLR)
Decided
30 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of execution pending appeal and leave to appeal out of timeCoramGIKONYO
Holding

The court granted leave to appeal out of time and the stay of execution pending appeal.

Facts

The applicant, Mombasa Khushi Motors Company Limited, was served with a proclamation notice on 23/05/2023, informing them of a judgment entered against them on 16/07/2018. The 1st Respondent, David Kinyanjui Mbuthia, obtained warrants of attachment of movable property in the execution of a decree against the applicant. The applicant intends to file an appeal against the judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time.
  2. Whether the applicant has demonstrated that the orders of stay of execution pending appeal are merited.

Reasoning

The court considered the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and the degree of prejudice to the respondent. The court found that the delay was reasonable and that the appeal has a reasonable chance of success.

Outcome

Leave to appeal out of time granted and stay of execution pending appeal granted.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time granted.
  • Stay of execution pending appeal granted.

Remedies

  • The applicant will be granted leave to appeal out of time.
  • The execution of the judgment will be stayed pending the appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act
  • Thuita Mwangi –vs- Kenya Airways Limited [2003] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case