SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Opera Software Ireland Ltd v Keraco Holdings Ltd (Miscellaneous Case E059 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 8699 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (22 July 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEHC 8699 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8699
Citation
[2024] KEHC 8699 (KLR)
Decided
22 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeForeign Judgments Reciprocal EnforcementPostureRecognition and Enforcement of Foreign JudgmentCoramAikens, Andrew Smith, MABEYA, Teare, Turkey
Holding

The judgment-debtor did not voluntarily submit or consent to the choice of law condition, and the original court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the matter. The subject judgment is subject to be set aside under section 10(2)(c) of the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act.

Facts

The judgment-creditor sought recognition and enforcement of a judgment given in the High Court of Justice, Kings Bench Division in London, UK, against the judgment-debtor for USD 4,370,944.81. The judgment-debtor opposed the summons, arguing that the judgment was not registrable due to an onerous jurisdiction clause and that the judgment-debtor was not informed of the proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the judgment-debtor voluntarily submitted to the choice of law condition
  2. Whether the judgment-debtor consented to the jurisdiction of the English courts

Reasoning

The jurisdiction clause was an onerous clause that should have been expressly brought to the attention of the judgment-debtor. The judgment-debtor was not informed of the proceedings that culminated in the judgment.

Outcome

The Originating Summons is dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case