SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Noor Aluminium & General Hardware Ltd v Hydro Aluminium Ltd (Civil Appeal E749 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 10690 (KLR) (Civ) (21 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEHC 10690 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
10690
Citation
[2025] KEHC 10690 (KLR)
Decided
21 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and decree of the Honourable V.M. Mochache, RM/Adjudicator given on 24.03.2023 in Milimani SCC COMM. No. E7846 of 2022CoramA.G. Ringera, DKN MAGARE, DS Majanja, FROO Olel, Gichohi, Odek, R.S.C Omolo, E.M. Githinji, Sichale
Holding

The court found that the matter had not exceeded its time and that the trial court's decision was not erroneous in law.

Facts

The Appellant, Noor Aluminium & General Hardware Ltd, claimed against the Respondent, Hydro Aluminium Ltd, for goods sold between 2021 and 2022 for a sum of Ksh. 265,978.42. The goods were in respect of invoices numbers 5810, 6162, and 6164. The Appellant disputed certain interest of 3% for delayed payments.

Issues

  1. whether the trial court erred in law in failing to dismiss the suit for being determined outside the 60 days provided under section 34 of the Small Claims Act
  2. whether the trial court erred in law in considering the matter beyond the 60 days provided

Reasoning

The court determined that the matter was not beyond the 60-day limit and that the trial court's decision was not erroneous in law.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Small Claims Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Twaher Abdulkarim Mohamed v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
  • Peter Gichuki King'ara vs Iebc & 2 Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case