SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Final Auto Centre Limited v Cerba Lancet Kenya Limited (Civil Appeal E010 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 14432 (KLR) (27 January 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEHC 14432 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
14432
Citation
[2025] KEHC 14432 (KLR)
Decided
27 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of proceedings and appealCoramGikonyo, NIO ADAGI
Holding

The court granted the application for stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

Final Auto Centre Limited filed a suit against Cerba Lancet Kenya Limited at the Mavoko Chief Magistrate's Court, seeking the release of two motor vehicles registration numbers. Cerba Lancet Kenya Limited claimed these vehicles were detained as lien for unpaid amounts. Final Auto Centre Limited was dissatisfied with the ruling and filed an appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Applicant/Appellant has met the criteria for grant of orders of stay of proceedings.
  2. Whether the Applicant/Appellant has met the criteria for grant of orders of stay pending Appeal.
  3. Who shall bear costs of the application.

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to stay the proceedings in the interest of justice, considering the need for expeditious disposal of cases and the merits of the appeal.

Outcome

The court granted the application for stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Orders

  • The court granted the stay of proceedings at Mavoko Law Courts in Civil Suit No. E558 of 2024.
  • The court ordered the stay and directions by Hon. S. Kandie be stayed and be hereby set aside until the final determination of the Appeal.

Remedies

  • The costs of this application be provided for.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Laws of Kenya
  • Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case