SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Githinji & another v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E073 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 18967 (KLR) (17 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEHC 18967 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
18967
Citation
[2025] KEHC 18967 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureApplication for review of sentencesCoramCW GITHUA
Holding

The court reduces the applicants' sentences by the period they had spent in lawful custody and orders that the period spent in Criminal Case No 1285 of 2011 be computed as part of their sentence.

Facts

Stephen Maina Githinji and Francis Githinji Gachogu were convicted of assault and attempted escape from lawful custody in Murang’a Criminal Case No 1285 of 2011 and sentenced to three years imprisonment each, to run concurrently. They were also convicted of robbery with violence in Criminal Case No 203 of 2011 and sentenced to death, which was later reduced to 30 years imprisonment.

Issues

  1. To reduce their sentences by the period they had spent in lawful custody
  2. To clarify the prison term in Criminal Case No 1285 of 2011

Reasoning

The court found that the trial court erred by not taking into account the period spent in lawful custody. The court also clarified that the applicants had already served their sentence in Criminal Case No 1285 of 2011 and are still serving their sentence in Criminal Case No 203 of 2011.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • To reduce the applicants' sentences by the period they had spent in lawful custody
  • To compute the period spent in Criminal Case No 1285 of 2011 as part of the sentence

Remedies

  • Reduction of sentences

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Penal Code
Cases cited (2)
  • Ahamed Abolfathi Mohamed & another v Republic (2018)
  • Furaha Charo Kazungu v Republic (2024)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case