SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NNN v DKC (Civil Suit E081 of 2021) [2025] KEHC 288 (KLR) (Civ) (23 January 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEHC 288 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
288
Citation
[2025] KEHC 288 (KLR)
Decided
23 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramHK CHEMITEI
Holding

The court declares the properties as matrimonial properties.

Facts

NNN and DKC are in a divorce case. NNN seeks to declare the properties as matrimonial properties and to restrain DKC from selling or disposing of them. The properties include a land, a motor vehicle, a motorcycle, a M-Pesa business, a shop, livestock, and household goods.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit properties constitute matrimonial properties.
  2. Whether the applicant contributed towards the acquisition and the development of the matrimonial properties.
  3. Whether the applicant is entitled to an equal share or such higher proportion of the matrimonial properties.

Reasoning

The court found that the properties are matrimonial properties as they were jointly owned and acquired during the subsistence of the marriage.

Outcome

The court declares the properties as matrimonial properties.

Orders

  • To restrain the Respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or disposing of the suit properties pending the outcome of the divorce cause.
  • To restrain the Respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or disposing of the suit properties unless done as per the court's order.

Remedies

  • To restrain the Respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or disposing of the suit properties pending the outcome of the divorce cause.
  • To restrain the Respondent from selling, transferring, alienating or disposing of the suit properties unless done as per the court's order.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Matrimonial Property Act No. 49 of 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case