SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

PMM v MGM (Civil Suit 81 of 2019) [2025] KEHC 9537 (KLR) (Family) (3 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEHC 9537 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
9537
Citation
[2025] KEHC 9537 (KLR)
Decided
3 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramHK CHEMITEI, KC
Holding

The court declared the suit properties as jointly owned by the parties and distributed them equally. The defendant was restrained from alienating the properties and compelled to release personal items.

Facts

The parties were married in 2011 and separated in 2015. They have a child together and both worked at the time of marriage. The suit properties include a house, vehicles, and land.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit properties are jointly owned
  2. Whether the properties should be distributed equally
  3. Whether the defendant can alienate the properties
  4. Whether the defendant should release personal items
  5. Whether the properties constitute matrimonial properties
  6. Whether the applicant made any contribution to the properties
  7. Whether the defendant withheld any personal items

Reasoning

The court found that the properties were acquired during the subsistence of the marriage and were jointly owned. The court also found that the applicant made a contribution to the properties and should be compensated accordingly.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • Declaration of jointly owned properties
  • Distribution of properties equally
  • Restraint on alienation of properties
  • Compulsion to release personal items

Remedies

  • Declaration of jointly owned properties
  • Distribution of properties equally
  • Restraint on alienation of properties
  • Compulsion to release personal items
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case