SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muchiri v Waaso Construction Limited (Civil Appeal E027 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1393 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (12 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEHC 1393 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1393
Citation
[2026] KEHC 1393 (KLR)
Decided
12 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the subordinate courtCoramJWW MONG'ARE
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the judgment of the trial court is set aside. The Appellant is awarded the sum of Kshs.4,725,420 as pleaded in the Plaint.

Facts

Wilson Muchiri sued Waaso Construction Limited for unpaid hardware materials totaling Kshs.4,725,420. The Respondent denied liability and asserted that the Appellant had been paid in full, citing uncredited payments or double entries on the Appellant's statements.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred by relying on documents filed by the Respondent that were never formally produced in evidence.
  2. Whether the trial court failed to properly analyze and assign probative value to the Appellant's evidence, including dishonored cheques, invoices, and delivery notes.

Reasoning

The court found that the trial court erred by relying on unproduced documents and failed to properly evaluate the Appellant's evidence.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment set aside
  • Award of Kshs.4,725,420 to the Appellant

Remedies

  • Award of Kshs.4,725,420 to the Appellant

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd (1968) EA 123
  • Avtar Singh Bahra & Amarjit Kaur Bahra v Raju Govindji Ganatra T/A Sweetbite Manufacturers (2001) KEHC 375 (KLR)
  • Motex Knitwear Limited v Gopitex Knitwear Mills Limited (2009) KEHC 4017 (KLR)
  • Karugi & another v Kabiya & 3 others (1983) KECA 38 (KLR)
  • Kenneth Nyaga Mwige v Austin Kiguta & 2 others (2015) KECA 334 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case