SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

R W K v A M A [2015] KEKC 32 (KLR)

[2015] KEKC 32 (KLR) KEKC
Read PDF
Court
KEKC
Case number
32
Citation
[2015] KEKC 32 (KLR)
Decided
23 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCustody and Maintenance DisputePostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramHON. A.I. HUSSEIN
Holding

The court grants the plaintiff physical custody of K.N.A. and legal custody to the defendant. The defendant is granted visitation rights and is ordered to provide Kshs. 25,000 monthly maintenance for K.N.A. and 75% of the school fees.

Facts

The plaintiff and defendant were married under Islamic Law on August 8, 2010, and had a daughter named K.N.A. The defendant filed for divorce on September 20, 2011, and paid some maintenance. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking to nullify the marriage, legal custody, acknowledgment of paternity, and maintenance.

Issues

  1. Voidness of the marriage
  2. Legal and actual custody of K.N.A.
  3. Acknowledgment of paternity
  4. Medical and educational support for K.N.A.
  5. Maintenance for the plaintiff

Reasoning

The court considers the best interest of the minor and the roles of both parents in her upbringing. It also applies Islamic personal law regarding maintenance.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • Physical custody to the plaintiff
  • Legal custody to the defendant
  • Visitation rights for the defendant
  • Monthly maintenance of Kshs. 25,000 for K.N.A.
  • 75% of school fees for K.N.A.
  • No further maintenance for the plaintiff

Remedies

  • Custody arrangements for K.N.A.
  • Maintenance for K.N.A.
  • Medical cover for K.N.A.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Children Act
  • Holy Quran
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case