SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

HO v OS [2018] KEKC 31 (KLR)

[2018] KEKC 31 (KLR) KEKC
Read PDF
Court
KEKC
Case number
31
Citation
[2018] KEKC 31 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePostureAppeal from original trialCoramGURACHO ABDI YUSSUF
Holding

The marriage is dissolved, the plaintiff is granted custody of the child, and the defendant is ordered to pay maintenance and a cow as dowry.

Facts

The plaintiff, HO, claimed for the return of her identity card, dowry, and custody of the child. She alleged that the defendant, OS, was irresponsible, abusive, and forced her to herd goats.

Issues

  1. Is the court entitled to dissolve the marriage?
  2. Is the plaintiff entitled to dowry of cow?
  3. Custody of the child.

Reasoning

The court found that the marriage is not worthy according to the Holy Quran and Hadith. The defendant was found to be abusive and not in good standing with the plaintiff.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • This marriage is hereby dissolved as requested by the in the way of faskhu.
  • Divorce certificate to be issued today.
  • The applicant should wait for the eddah period of three months as from today.
  • It is compulsory for the respondent to surrender the applicant's Identity card as soon possible.
  • It is compulsory for the respondent to pay one cow as the dowry within 15 days from today.
  • Custody of the child is given to the plaintiff and the respondent shall have reasonable access to her.
  • It is compulsory for the respondent to pay kshs. 4000/= as maintenance for his child and the plaintiff monthly effect from January 2019.

Remedies

  • Dowry of cow
  • Custody of the child
  • Maintenance for the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Surat Arum verse 21
  • Surat Atwalaq verse 6
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case