SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SB v BG (Divorce Cause 22 of 2019) [2019] KEKC 25 (KLR) (13 November 2019) (Judgment)

[2019] KEKC 25 (KLR) KEKC
Read PDF
Court
KEKC
Case number
25
Citation
[2019] KEKC 25 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePosturePetition for dissolution of marriage, legal and actual custody of the issues, and property settlementCoramHON. ABDULHALIM H. ATHMAN
Holding

The court finds that the petitioner is entitled to dissolution of marriage, legal and actual custody of the children, and the respondent is to provide maintenance. The respondent is not entitled to the petitioner's property.

Facts

The petitioner, SB, is a clinical officer and the respondent, BG, is a sergeant. They have five children and were married under Islamic law in 2004. The petitioner claims BG is adulterous, disrespectful, cruel, and fails to provide for the family's needs. BG denies these claims and states the petitioner neglected his ailing mother, leading to his remarriage.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to dissolution of marriage, dowry, custody, and maintenance of the children
  2. Burden of proof on the petitioner

Reasoning

The court relies on Islamic law and evidence, emphasizing the petitioner's burden of proof and the respondent's denial of the allegations.

Outcome

Dissolution of marriage granted to the petitioner

Orders

  • Dissolution of marriage
  • Legal and actual custody of the children
  • Maintenance to be provided by the respondent

Remedies

  • Maintenance to be provided by the respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kadhi's Court Act, Cap 11 laws of Kenya
  • Qur'an Al Naml:27:64
Cases cited (1)
  • Prophetic tradition Hadith narrated by Ibn Abbas
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case